<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dust to dust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/</link>
	<description>dispatches from Canada&#039;s capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:59:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On being a cyborg</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On being a cyborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-3519</guid>
		<description>[...] There is a lot of talk these days about combining all the gizmos a person is likely to carry around into one all-purpose device. Sometimes, people term this amalgamation an &#8216;iPod killer.&#8217; Personally, I don&#8217;t think it will ever fly, except with the nerdiest of the nerds. As it stands, there is a very solid chance that at least one among my digital camera, music player, or mobile phone will be broken at any particular time. If I had to mail all three to Stoke-on-Trent for three weeks every time one failed, I would soon be living a quiet and pictureless life. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is a lot of talk these days about combining all the gizmos a person is likely to carry around into one all-purpose device. Sometimes, people term this amalgamation an &#8216;iPod killer.&#8217; Personally, I don&#8217;t think it will ever fly, except with the nerdiest of the nerds. As it stands, there is a very solid chance that at least one among my digital camera, music player, or mobile phone will be broken at any particular time. If I had to mail all three to Stoke-on-Trent for three weeks every time one failed, I would soon be living a quiet and pictureless life. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A coast mountain hike in September</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-3453</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A coast mountain hike in September</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-3453</guid>
		<description>[...] PS. My injured camera has been returned, restored to health. Curiously, it seems like they opted to both clean the CCD and replace the lens assembly. That must have been where the leak introducing the dust was located. One nice feature of it being repaired rather than replaced is that the numbering of the photos will not start at zero. If it had, many of the new images would have filenames identical to those already on here. The camera is slightly noisier zooming in and out than it was before, but it seems to be dust-free. The money I had set aside to replace it if necessary has been added to the dSLR fund. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PS. My injured camera has been returned, restored to health. Curiously, it seems like they opted to both clean the CCD and replace the lens assembly. That must have been where the leak introducing the dust was located. One nice feature of it being repaired rather than replaced is that the numbering of the photos will not start at zero. If it had, many of the new images would have filenames identical to those already on here. The camera is slightly noisier zooming in and out than it was before, but it seems to be dust-free. The money I had set aside to replace it if necessary has been added to the dSLR fund. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;q=Colchester,+UK&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=51.909544,0.901566&amp;spn=0.349043,1.286774&amp;om=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Colchester&lt;/a&gt; seems to be closer to Oxford than &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;q=Stoke-on-Trent,+UK&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=53.330873,-0.889893&amp;spn=2.703316,10.294189&amp;om=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stoke-on-Trent&lt;/a&gt;, though it is probably equally expensive to ship things to either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&#038;hl=en&#038;q=Colchester,+UK&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;ll=51.909544,0.901566&#038;spn=0.349043,1.286774&#038;om=1" rel="nofollow">Colchester</a> seems to be closer to Oxford than <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&#038;hl=en&#038;q=Stoke-on-Trent,+UK&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;ll=53.330873,-0.889893&#038;spn=2.703316,10.294189&#038;om=1" rel="nofollow">Stoke-on-Trent</a>, though it is probably equally expensive to ship things to either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>Provided I can find both the receipt for the original camera (which I exchanged because it had a defective flash) and the receipt for the exchange, this A510 will be going to meet its maker. I don&#039;t know which of these service centres is closest, but one should carry out the replacement or repair: Colchester or Stoke-on-Trent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Provided I can find both the receipt for the original camera (which I exchanged because it had a defective flash) and the receipt for the exchange, this A510 will be going to meet its maker. I don&#8217;t know which of these service centres is closest, but one should carry out the replacement or repair: Colchester or Stoke-on-Trent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2950</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2950</guid>
		<description>&quot;As for the £500: I have 2,200 Pounds in college fees and more than 10,400 Pounds in university fees to pay next year.&quot;

You can turn that argument on it&#039;s head. If you are spending £12,600 on tuition, does it matter so much if you spend £400 on something you will make good use of, and use for years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As for the £500: I have 2,200 Pounds in college fees and more than 10,400 Pounds in university fees to pay next year.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can turn that argument on it&#8217;s head. If you are spending £12,600 on tuition, does it matter so much if you spend £400 on something you will make good use of, and use for years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2944</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2944</guid>
		<description>Tristan,

I was referring to the use of my existing zoom with a DSLR body. The kit lens, as you say, would offer a comparable field of view.

On the dust issue, I have taken Neal&#039;s suggestion and sent an email to Canon asking if it might be covered under the warranty. If the cause is a faulty seal, then you could say it&#039;s a manufacturer&#039;s defect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tristan,</p>
<p>I was referring to the use of my existing zoom with a DSLR body. The kit lens, as you say, would offer a comparable field of view.</p>
<p>On the dust issue, I have taken Neal&#8217;s suggestion and sent an email to Canon asking if it might be covered under the warranty. If the cause is a faulty seal, then you could say it&#8217;s a manufacturer&#8217;s defect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Laing</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2943</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Laing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2943</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little confused. 18mm times 1.6 gives you the &quot;look&quot; of 28mm. 

If you are very concerned about vignetting and distortion there are ways around it. Such as, you could get the body only kit and a 5 year old sigma 18-35 zoom (as I have), which is very low in distortion (but not likely any sharper than the kit lens). If you have photoshop CS2, the distortion from the kit lens is likely entirely correctable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little confused. 18mm times 1.6 gives you the &#8220;look&#8221; of 28mm. </p>
<p>If you are very concerned about vignetting and distortion there are ways around it. Such as, you could get the body only kit and a 5 year old sigma 18-35 zoom (as I have), which is very low in distortion (but not likely any sharper than the kit lens). If you have photoshop CS2, the distortion from the kit lens is likely entirely correctable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2942</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2942</guid>
		<description>Also:

In a friend&#039;s considered opinion: &quot;It&#039;s definately dust...
fungus is softer and spreads slowly...
this is new dots appearing...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also:</p>
<p>In a friend&#8217;s considered opinion: &#8220;It&#8217;s definately dust&#8230;<br />
fungus is softer and spreads slowly&#8230;<br />
this is new dots appearing&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2941</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2941</guid>
		<description>I really love the look of 28mm. I&#039;d hate to sacrifice that part of the range on my zoom to 1.6x multiplication.

As for the£500: I have 2,200 Pounds in college fees and more than 10,400 Pounds in university fees to pay next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love the look of 28mm. I&#8217;d hate to sacrifice that part of the range on my zoom to 1.6x multiplication.</p>
<p>As for the£500: I have 2,200 Pounds in college fees and more than 10,400 Pounds in university fees to pay next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2940</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/07/19/dust-to-dust/#comment-2940</guid>
		<description>Adorama has the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adorama.com/ICADRXTSK.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Canon Digital Rebel XT along with an 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens&lt;/a&gt; for US$779 new. That comes with a battery pack and charger.

Note: you did just get an unexpected £500... did you not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adorama has the <a href="http://www.adorama.com/ICADRXTSK.html" rel="nofollow">Canon Digital Rebel XT along with an 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens</a> for US$779 new. That comes with a battery pack and charger.</p>
<p>Note: you did just get an unexpected £500&#8230; did you not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
