<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protecting your computer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/</link>
	<description>dispatches from Canada's capital</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-58043</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-58043</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/02/1314208&#38;from=rss" rel="nofollow"&gt;Apple Quietly Recommends Antivirus Software For Macs&lt;/a&gt;

"After years of boasting about the Mac's near invincibility, Apple is now advising its customers to install security software on their computers. Apple — which has continually played on Windows' vulnerability to viruses in its advertising campaigns — issued the advice in a low-key message on its support forums. 'Apple encourages the widespread use of multiple antivirus utilities so that virus programmers have more than one application to circumvent, thus making the whole virus writing process more difficult.' It goes on to recommend a handful of products."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/02/1314208&amp;from=rss" rel="nofollow">Apple Quietly Recommends Antivirus Software For Macs</a></p>
<p>&#8220;After years of boasting about the Mac&#8217;s near invincibility, Apple is now advising its customers to install security software on their computers. Apple — which has continually played on Windows&#8217; vulnerability to viruses in its advertising campaigns — issued the advice in a low-key message on its support forums. &#8216;Apple encourages the widespread use of multiple antivirus utilities so that virus programmers have more than one application to circumvent, thus making the whole virus writing process more difficult.&#8217; It goes on to recommend a handful of products.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-29848</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-29848</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/12/how_to_secure_y.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;How to Secure Your Computer, Disks, and Portable Drives&lt;/a&gt;
By Bruce Schneier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/12/how_to_secure_y.html" rel="nofollow">How to Secure Your Computer, Disks, and Portable Drives</a><br />
By Bruce Schneier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mac security tips</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-25898</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mac security tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-25898</guid>
		<description>[...] Some more general advice I wrote earlier: Protecting your computer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some more general advice I wrote earlier: Protecting your computer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Once more on the importance of backups</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-25665</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Once more on the importance of backups</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-25665</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned before, the best defence against data loss from viruses or hardware damage is to make comprehensive, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned before, the best defence against data loss from viruses or hardware damage is to make comprehensive, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-15457</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 20:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-15457</guid>
		<description>An excellent recent post from Bruce Schneier:

&lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/05/does_secrecy_he.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Does Secrecy Help Protect Personal Information?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent recent post from Bruce Schneier:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/05/does_secrecy_he.html" rel="nofollow">Does Secrecy Help Protect Personal Information?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Important OS X update</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-13982</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Important OS X update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-13982</guid>
		<description>[...] then choose &#8216;Software Update&#8217; from the menu that comes down. While being on a Mac does make you safer, it certainly does not make you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then choose &#8216;Software Update&#8217; from the menu that comes down. While being on a Mac does make you safer, it certainly does not make you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-12130</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-12130</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/daily/columns/techview/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8908243" rel="nofollow"&gt;Guard yourself against identity theft&lt;/a&gt;

Symantec says that in the second half of 2006 some 6m computers around the world were infected by “bots” (robotic pieces of malicious software), 29% up on the previous six months. Four out of five of them had been attacked by Trojan horses that sniffed out confidential information by logging keystrokes, recording internet sites visited, and reporting the findings to a third party. Other unsuspecting users were redirected to fake websites where they were fooled by phishing scams into parting with their identity details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/daily/columns/techview/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8908243" rel="nofollow">Guard yourself against identity theft</a></p>
<p>Symantec says that in the second half of 2006 some 6m computers around the world were infected by “bots” (robotic pieces of malicious software), 29% up on the previous six months. Four out of five of them had been attacked by Trojan horses that sniffed out confidential information by logging keystrokes, recording internet sites visited, and reporting the findings to a third party. Other unsuspecting users were redirected to fake websites where they were fooled by phishing scams into parting with their identity details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-9402</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-9402</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/02/drm_in_windows.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;DRM in Windows Vista&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/02/drm_in_windows.html" rel="nofollow">DRM in Windows Vista</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-8295</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-8295</guid>
		<description>While it isn't perfect, Microsoft has a &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/privacy/password_checker.mspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;password strength checker&lt;/a&gt; online.

Just make sure nobody is sniffing packets across your network, before you test all your most secret passwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it isn&#8217;t perfect, Microsoft has a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/privacy/password_checker.mspx" rel="nofollow">password strength checker</a> online.</p>
<p>Just make sure nobody is sniffing packets across your network, before you test all your most secret passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-7403</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-7403</guid>
		<description>Another good Schneier piece:

&lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/01/choosing_secure.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Choosing Secure Passwords&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good Schneier piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/01/choosing_secure.html" rel="nofollow">Choosing Secure Passwords</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-6719</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-6719</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/?p=434" rel="nofollow"&gt;Serious Gmail vulnerability fixed&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;em&gt;This sample script once proudly displayed the visitors contact list if they were logged into their Google account.  Only hours after it was reported to the Google security team, the vulnerability was fixed.&lt;/em&gt;

That was quick. I hope it's true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/?p=434" rel="nofollow">Serious Gmail vulnerability fixed</a></p>
<p><em>This sample script once proudly displayed the visitors contact list if they were logged into their Google account.  Only hours after it was reported to the Google security team, the vulnerability was fixed.</em></p>
<p>That was quick. I hope it&#8217;s true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-6718</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2006/10/09/protecting-your-computer/#comment-6718</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/01/gmail-bug-exposes-your-mail-account-to-spammers/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Gmail bug exposes your mail account to spammers&lt;/a&gt;

Like your Gmail account? Consider it a sacred place which must be protected from spammers at all cost? Yeah, us too. Well, we hate to break the bad news at the dawn of the new year but there's a weakness in Gmail which exposes your email address to any web site capable of exploiting the bug. As reported on Digg, the exploit takes advantage of the fact that Google puts your details into a JS file. As a result, if you're logged into Gmail and browsing the web, any rogue website can declare the function "google" and then parse all your contacts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/01/gmail-bug-exposes-your-mail-account-to-spammers/" rel="nofollow">Gmail bug exposes your mail account to spammers</a></p>
<p>Like your Gmail account? Consider it a sacred place which must be protected from spammers at all cost? Yeah, us too. Well, we hate to break the bad news at the dawn of the new year but there&#8217;s a weakness in Gmail which exposes your email address to any web site capable of exploiting the bug. As reported on Digg, the exploit takes advantage of the fact that Google puts your details into a JS file. As a result, if you&#8217;re logged into Gmail and browsing the web, any rogue website can declare the function &#8220;google&#8221; and then parse all your contacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 8.988 seconds -->
