<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate change all over the news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/</link>
	<description>dispatches from Canada's capital</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8373</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8373</guid>
		<description>I partially disagree with Maniates(which i noted in my Consumption essay that was published in the UBCIR journal a year and a half ago). I argue that consumption in of itself isnt the problem but its what we consume that is. If everything we consumed was renewable and enviro friendly then no prob. If we reduce consumption in general then capitalism can not work and we must find a new system. I think that is not really feasible at this last stage of the game. So in turn what better way to influence individuals than through consumption(we are all well conditioned as such). Institutions can not change unless the majority of individuals are of the enviro conservational mindset. If the majority of citizens recycled and used enviro friendly bulbs then chances are the consensus would be there for institutional change needed to really combat our unfriendly non-renewable consumption habits...sorry about the rambling rant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I partially disagree with Maniates(which i noted in my Consumption essay that was published in the UBCIR journal a year and a half ago). I argue that consumption in of itself isnt the problem but its what we consume that is. If everything we consumed was renewable and enviro friendly then no prob. If we reduce consumption in general then capitalism can not work and we must find a new system. I think that is not really feasible at this last stage of the game. So in turn what better way to influence individuals than through consumption(we are all well conditioned as such). Institutions can not change unless the majority of individuals are of the enviro conservational mindset. If the majority of citizens recycled and used enviro friendly bulbs then chances are the consensus would be there for institutional change needed to really combat our unfriendly non-renewable consumption habits&#8230;sorry about the rambling rant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8370</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8370</guid>
		<description>Interesting:

"New York's biggest environmental contribution lies in the fact that less than one-third of New Yorkers drive to work. Nationwide, more than seven out of eight commuters drive. More than one-third of all the public transportation commuters in America live in the five boroughs. The absence of cars leads Matthew Kahn, in his fascinating book, "Green Cities," to estimate that New York has by a wide margin the least gas usage per capita of all American metropolitan areas. The Department of Energy data confirm that New York State's energy consumption is next to last in the country because of New York City."

From the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;

Via &lt;a href="http://greeneconomics.blogspot.com/2007/01/glaeser-on-urban-greeness.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting:</p>
<p>&#8220;New York&#8217;s biggest environmental contribution lies in the fact that less than one-third of New Yorkers drive to work. Nationwide, more than seven out of eight commuters drive. More than one-third of all the public transportation commuters in America live in the five boroughs. The absence of cars leads Matthew Kahn, in his fascinating book, &#8220;Green Cities,&#8221; to estimate that New York has by a wide margin the least gas usage per capita of all American metropolitan areas. The Department of Energy data confirm that New York State&#8217;s energy consumption is next to last in the country because of New York City.&#8221;</p>
<p>From the <em>New York Times</em></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://greeneconomics.blogspot.com/2007/01/glaeser-on-urban-greeness.html" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alena Prazak</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8360</link>
		<dc:creator>Alena Prazak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8360</guid>
		<description>I always wonder why people endorse some ideas with great passion, and others are so difficult for them.  Perhaps it applies to a scale of inconvenience that it causes them.  Recycling has become the norm in North Vancouver and nobody minds.  As the price of gas fluctuates in the upward direction, so does the number of SUV's that you see on the North Shore.  This is presumably for safety on more busy roads. We cry over Stanley Park, but douse our lawns with chemicals each spring to get rid of moss.  I love my moss because you don't have to cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wonder why people endorse some ideas with great passion, and others are so difficult for them.  Perhaps it applies to a scale of inconvenience that it causes them.  Recycling has become the norm in North Vancouver and nobody minds.  As the price of gas fluctuates in the upward direction, so does the number of SUV&#8217;s that you see on the North Shore.  This is presumably for safety on more busy roads. We cry over Stanley Park, but douse our lawns with chemicals each spring to get rid of moss.  I love my moss because you don&#8217;t have to cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8353</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8353</guid>
		<description>Once again, I feel as though I should direct people to the concise and convincing: "Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World?" by Michael F. Maniates. Try Google Scholar and, if your institution doesn't have access, I can send you a copy.

Here is the abstract:

&lt;em&gt;An increasingly dominant, largely American response to the contemporary environmental crisis understands environmental degradation as the product of individual shortcomings and finds solutions in enlightened, uncoordinated consumer choice. Several forces promote this process of individualization, including the historical baggage of mainstream environmentalism, the core tenets of liberalism, the dynamic ability of capitalism to commodify dissent, and the relatively recent rise of global environmental threats to human prosperity. The result is to narrow our collective ability to imagine and pursue a variety of productive responses to the environmental problems before us. When responsibility for environmental problems is individualized, there is little room to ponder institutions, the nature and exercise of political power, or ways of collectively changing the distribution of power and influence in society. Confronting consumption requires individuals to understand themselves not primarily as consumers but rather as citizens in a participatory democracy, working together to change broader policy and larger social institutions. It also requires linking explorations of consumption to politically charged issues that challenge the political imagination.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, I feel as though I should direct people to the concise and convincing: &#8220;Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the World?&#8221; by Michael F. Maniates. Try Google Scholar and, if your institution doesn&#8217;t have access, I can send you a copy.</p>
<p>Here is the abstract:</p>
<p><em>An increasingly dominant, largely American response to the contemporary environmental crisis understands environmental degradation as the product of individual shortcomings and finds solutions in enlightened, uncoordinated consumer choice. Several forces promote this process of individualization, including the historical baggage of mainstream environmentalism, the core tenets of liberalism, the dynamic ability of capitalism to commodify dissent, and the relatively recent rise of global environmental threats to human prosperity. The result is to narrow our collective ability to imagine and pursue a variety of productive responses to the environmental problems before us. When responsibility for environmental problems is individualized, there is little room to ponder institutions, the nature and exercise of political power, or ways of collectively changing the distribution of power and influence in society. Confronting consumption requires individuals to understand themselves not primarily as consumers but rather as citizens in a participatory democracy, working together to change broader policy and larger social institutions. It also requires linking explorations of consumption to politically charged issues that challenge the political imagination.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8344</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8344</guid>
		<description>Tristain you just need to think of that light bulb as a seed that has been planted. The actual lightbulb and its ability to reduce climate change is not the important aspect. Once the idea is there it will spread and invade other aspects of societal thinking and acting on the matter. That is why I still recycle and convince others to do so even though I realize it is not even a drop in the bucket but I am still helping sow that seed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tristain you just need to think of that light bulb as a seed that has been planted. The actual lightbulb and its ability to reduce climate change is not the important aspect. Once the idea is there it will spread and invade other aspects of societal thinking and acting on the matter. That is why I still recycle and convince others to do so even though I realize it is not even a drop in the bucket but I am still helping sow that seed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Laing</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8341</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Laing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8341</guid>
		<description>The front page of one of the papers inner sections (I don't remember, but it was likely the business section) was a triumphant review of an entrepreneur who had "taken on the big boys" with a good idea of some environmentally friendly low power lightbulb. 

I've frankly had enough of people who think the planet will be saved by low wattage lightbulbs Fair enough in hot climates where a/c actually accounts for a large proportion of electricity costs, but anytime a furnace is running a low wattage bulb won't save you a nickel. In fact, an incondescent lightbulb is a more efficient heater than any forced air furnace (because it emits radiant heat, some of which is visible, rather than blown air).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The front page of one of the papers inner sections (I don&#8217;t remember, but it was likely the business section) was a triumphant review of an entrepreneur who had &#8220;taken on the big boys&#8221; with a good idea of some environmentally friendly low power lightbulb. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve frankly had enough of people who think the planet will be saved by low wattage lightbulbs Fair enough in hot climates where a/c actually accounts for a large proportion of electricity costs, but anytime a furnace is running a low wattage bulb won&#8217;t save you a nickel. In fact, an incondescent lightbulb is a more efficient heater than any forced air furnace (because it emits radiant heat, some of which is visible, rather than blown air).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8324</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8324</guid>
		<description>I don't follow closely, but I think climate change has been topical lately.

I was writing my thesis - concerning elections/voting mechanisms - in the build up to the UK general election of 2005. Sadly the election was two late to include, but I tried to save interesting newspapers snippets for future reference/use (not that I would be able to find them now)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t follow closely, but I think climate change has been topical lately.</p>
<p>I was writing my thesis - concerning elections/voting mechanisms - in the build up to the UK general election of 2005. Sadly the election was two late to include, but I tried to save interesting newspapers snippets for future reference/use (not that I would be able to find them now)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8310</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/01/29/climate-change-all-over-the-news/#comment-8310</guid>
		<description>When you write about stuff that's really scattershot, you apologize. When you write about just one thing, you apologize.

Dude... just chill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you write about stuff that&#8217;s really scattershot, you apologize. When you write about just one thing, you apologize.</p>
<p>Dude&#8230; just chill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 5.630 seconds -->
