<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nicholas Stern on climate change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/</link>
	<description>Temporarily Torontonian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ways to spend money on climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-46287</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ways to spend money on climate change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-46287</guid>
		<description>[...] change impacts, etc - further complicates the problem of prioritization. Economic analyses like the Stern Review argue that investing in mitigation urgently is a better choice than waiting or investing primarily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] change impacts, etc &#8211; further complicates the problem of prioritization. Economic analyses like the Stern Review argue that investing in mitigation urgently is a better choice than waiting or investing primarily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-37382</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-37382</guid>
		<description>Throwing down the gauntlet to climate change sceptics, Lord Stern, former chief economist at the World Bank, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f8e1377a-0c15-11dd-9840-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;told the Financial Times yesterday&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;We underestimated the risks . . . we underestimated the damage associated with the temperature increases . . . and we underestimated the probabilities of temperature increases.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throwing down the gauntlet to climate change sceptics, Lord Stern, former chief economist at the World Bank, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f8e1377a-0c15-11dd-9840-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1" rel="nofollow">told the Financial Times yesterday</a>: &#8220;We underestimated the risks . . . we underestimated the damage associated with the temperature increases . . . and we underestimated the probabilities of temperature increases.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nicholas Stern video</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-34613</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nicholas Stern video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-34613</guid>
		<description>[...] Sir Nicholas Stern&#8217;s presentation in the Examination Schools at Oxford in February of 2007. I was lucky enough to attend in person; I even got to speak with him at the exclusive reception afterwards. My notes are on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sir Nicholas Stern&#8217;s presentation in the Examination Schools at Oxford in February of 2007. I was lucky enough to attend in person; I even got to speak with him at the exclusive reception afterwards. My notes are on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-31707</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-31707</guid>
		<description>Via WSJ, Sir Nicholas Stern &lt;a href=&quot;http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/7/225935/6513&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;says he underestimated the risks of climate change in his influential report&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;We underestimated the flow of emissions from developing countries, especially China,&quot; he said, observing that emissions of greenhouse gases from China over the next 25 years will equal the total emissions from the U.S. and Europe over the last century. Emissions from developing countries and developed countries must be capped, he said, but the ethics of allocating the pain are delicate. &quot;If you&#039;re consuming the goods, you can&#039;t blame the location of the factory,&quot; he argued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via WSJ, Sir Nicholas Stern <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/7/225935/6513" rel="nofollow">says he underestimated the risks of climate change in his influential report</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;We underestimated the flow of emissions from developing countries, especially China,&#8221; he said, observing that emissions of greenhouse gases from China over the next 25 years will equal the total emissions from the U.S. and Europe over the last century. Emissions from developing countries and developed countries must be capped, he said, but the ethics of allocating the pain are delicate. &#8220;If you&#8217;re consuming the goods, you can&#8217;t blame the location of the factory,&#8221; he argued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Knowledge brokers get the Nobel</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-25496</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Knowledge brokers get the Nobel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-25496</guid>
		<description>[...] Nicholas Stern on climate change [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nicholas Stern on climate change [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heat: How to Stop the Planet from Burning</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-21279</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heat: How to Stop the Planet from Burning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-21279</guid>
		<description>[...] it to say, Monbiot is not in the main stream of this debate. The Stern consensus is that climate change can be dealt with at moderate cost. Even if Monbiot&#8217;s ideas are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it to say, Monbiot is not in the main stream of this debate. The Stern consensus is that climate change can be dealt with at moderate cost. Even if Monbiot&#8217;s ideas are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Experts: scientists and economists</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10396</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Experts: scientists and economists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10396</guid>
		<description>[...] 25 February 2007] I recently saw Nicholas Stern speak about his report. My entry about it contains a link to detailed notes on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 25 February 2007] I recently saw Nicholas Stern speak about his report. My entry about it contains a link to detailed notes on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cate</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10157</link>
		<dc:creator>Cate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10157</guid>
		<description>If it were necessary to make radical changes in our ways of life (no private cars, for example) is it something we could ever do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were necessary to make radical changes in our ways of life (no private cars, for example) is it something we could ever do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10140</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10140</guid>
		<description>ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION

CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE CANADIAN RESPONSE: PARTIES, POLICY...PROCEDURE?

Date: Mon 26 February, 7:00pm (week 7)
Venue: Magdalen College, Old Law Library


On February 2nd, 2007, the United Nations&#039; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) released a report stating – with over 90% certainty – that
global warming is the direct result of the accumulation of greenhouse gases
produced by human activity. These findings reconfirm that Climate Change is a
global concern of undeniable urgency – one which threatens to bring about
ecological and economic upheaval on an international scale, and one which we
can actually do something about.

On February 14th, 2007, the Canadian House of Commons passed a Private
Member&#039;s Bill – introduced by Liberal backbencher Pablo Rodriguez and put
forth by a unified opposition – which forces Stephen Harper&#039;s minority
Conservative government to &quot;ensure Canada meets its global climate change
obligations under the Kyoto Protocol.&quot; Since its election in January of 2006,
Harper&#039;s Tory administration has been ideologically and effectively opposed to
the UN&#039;s Kyoto Protocol, which assigns mandatory targets for the reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions to signatory nations. It was under Liberal leadership
that Canada formally ratified this treaty in 2002.

On Monday, February 26th, 2007, the Canadian Society will host a roundtable
discussion on Climate Change which will address the following questions: (1)
What is Canada – as a wealthy, leading nation – actually doing to combat
global warming? (2) Is the Canadian party system as it stands potentially
hindering the implementation of widespread and binding environmental policies?
(3) What can and should Canadians be doing to hold their government
accountable to younger and future generations on this issue?

The event will be held at Magdalen College, in the Old Law Library, from
7:00pm to 9:00pm. Please come on time, as the room has a limited capacity.
Questions/comments about the discussion: katie.musgrave@ccc.ox.ac.uk

There will be light refreshments available, including wine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION</p>
<p>CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE CANADIAN RESPONSE: PARTIES, POLICY&#8230;PROCEDURE?</p>
<p>Date: Mon 26 February, 7:00pm (week 7)<br />
Venue: Magdalen College, Old Law Library</p>
<p>On February 2nd, 2007, the United Nations&#8217; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate<br />
Change (IPCC) released a report stating – with over 90% certainty – that<br />
global warming is the direct result of the accumulation of greenhouse gases<br />
produced by human activity. These findings reconfirm that Climate Change is a<br />
global concern of undeniable urgency – one which threatens to bring about<br />
ecological and economic upheaval on an international scale, and one which we<br />
can actually do something about.</p>
<p>On February 14th, 2007, the Canadian House of Commons passed a Private<br />
Member&#8217;s Bill – introduced by Liberal backbencher Pablo Rodriguez and put<br />
forth by a unified opposition – which forces Stephen Harper&#8217;s minority<br />
Conservative government to &#8220;ensure Canada meets its global climate change<br />
obligations under the Kyoto Protocol.&#8221; Since its election in January of 2006,<br />
Harper&#8217;s Tory administration has been ideologically and effectively opposed to<br />
the UN&#8217;s Kyoto Protocol, which assigns mandatory targets for the reduction of<br />
greenhouse gas emissions to signatory nations. It was under Liberal leadership<br />
that Canada formally ratified this treaty in 2002.</p>
<p>On Monday, February 26th, 2007, the Canadian Society will host a roundtable<br />
discussion on Climate Change which will address the following questions: (1)<br />
What is Canada – as a wealthy, leading nation – actually doing to combat<br />
global warming? (2) Is the Canadian party system as it stands potentially<br />
hindering the implementation of widespread and binding environmental policies?<br />
(3) What can and should Canadians be doing to hold their government<br />
accountable to younger and future generations on this issue?</p>
<p>The event will be held at Magdalen College, in the Old Law Library, from<br />
7:00pm to 9:00pm. Please come on time, as the room has a limited capacity.<br />
Questions/comments about the discussion: <a href="mailto:katie.musgrave@ccc.ox.ac.uk">katie.musgrave@ccc.ox.ac.uk</a></p>
<p>There will be light refreshments available, including wine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10112</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10112</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;To stabilize at 450ppm, we would need to slow the rate of growth in GHG emissions immediately, having it peak in 2010. Then, we would need to reduce at about 6-10% a year thereafter&lt;/em&gt;

If that&#039;s what it will take, I think we are royally screwed. There&#039;s no hope in America until a new administration in 2008. Then, they would need to crack the whip pretty hard to deal with emissions growth between the present and then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>To stabilize at 450ppm, we would need to slow the rate of growth in GHG emissions immediately, having it peak in 2010. Then, we would need to reduce at about 6-10% a year thereafter</em></p>
<p>If that&#8217;s what it will take, I think we are royally screwed. There&#8217;s no hope in America until a new administration in 2008. Then, they would need to crack the whip pretty hard to deal with emissions growth between the present and then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10102</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/02/21/nicholas-stern-on-climate-change/#comment-10102</guid>
		<description>I love how the genre of Enter the Haggis is listed as &#039;	Explosive Canadian Celtic Fusion.&#039; It is a truly apt description.

I have listened to &quot;Lannigan&#039;s Ball&quot; 34 times in the last 24 hours.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how the genre of Enter the Haggis is listed as &#8216;	Explosive Canadian Celtic Fusion.&#8217; It is a truly apt description.</p>
<p>I have listened to &#8220;Lannigan&#8217;s Ball&#8221; 34 times in the last 24 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

