<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big rocks in space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/</link>
	<description>Temporarily Torontonian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-83224</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-83224</guid>
		<description>&quot;The picture that is emerging, then, is of a strange set of coincidences. First, two of the biggest impacts in history happened within 300,000 years of each other—a geological eyeblink. Second, they coincided with one of the largest periods of vulcanicity in the past billion years. Third, one of them just happened to strike where these volcanoes were active. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14698363&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Or, to put it another way, what really killed the dinosaurs was a string of the most atrocious bad luck.&lt;/a&gt;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The picture that is emerging, then, is of a strange set of coincidences. First, two of the biggest impacts in history happened within 300,000 years of each other—a geological eyeblink. Second, they coincided with one of the largest periods of vulcanicity in the past billion years. Third, one of them just happened to strike where these volcanoes were active. <a href="http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14698363" rel="nofollow">Or, to put it another way, what really killed the dinosaurs was a string of the most atrocious bad luck.</a>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-82314</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-82314</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;Algae First To Recover After Asteroid Strike&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;The asteroid that impacted earth 65 million years ago killed off dinosaurs, but microalgae bounced back from the global extinction in about 100 years or less. Julio Sepúlveda, a geochemist at MIT, studied the molecular remains of microorganisms by extracting organic residues from rocks dated to the K-T extinction (in this research referred to as Cretaceous-Paleogene), and his results show that the ocean algae community greatly shrunk in size but only for about a century. &#039;We found that primary production in this part of the ocean recovered extremely rapidly after the impact,&#039; says Julio Sepúlveda. Algae leave certain signatures of organic compounds and isotopes of carbon and nitrogen; bacteria leave different signatures. In the earliest layers after the asteroid impact, the researchers found much evidence for bacteria but little for algae, suggesting that right after the impact, algae production was greatly reduced. But the chemical signs of algae start to increase immediately above this layer. A full recovery of the ocean ecosystem probably took about a million years, but the quick rebound of photosynthesizing algae seems to confirm models that suggest the impact delivered a swift, abrupt blow to the Earth&#039;s environment.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a>Algae First To Recover After Asteroid Strike</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The asteroid that impacted earth 65 million years ago killed off dinosaurs, but microalgae bounced back from the global extinction in about 100 years or less. Julio Sepúlveda, a geochemist at MIT, studied the molecular remains of microorganisms by extracting organic residues from rocks dated to the K-T extinction (in this research referred to as Cretaceous-Paleogene), and his results show that the ocean algae community greatly shrunk in size but only for about a century. &#8216;We found that primary production in this part of the ocean recovered extremely rapidly after the impact,&#8217; says Julio Sepúlveda. Algae leave certain signatures of organic compounds and isotopes of carbon and nitrogen; bacteria leave different signatures. In the earliest layers after the asteroid impact, the researchers found much evidence for bacteria but little for algae, suggesting that right after the impact, algae production was greatly reduced. But the chemical signs of algae start to increase immediately above this layer. A full recovery of the ocean ecosystem probably took about a million years, but the quick rebound of photosynthesizing algae seems to confirm models that suggest the impact delivered a swift, abrupt blow to the Earth&#8217;s environment.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A global response to the threat of asteroids</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-59240</link>
		<dc:creator>A global response to the threat of asteroids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-59240</guid>
		<description>[...] consideration is that of the inevitable collisions that will occur between our planet and other big rocks in space. A group called The Association of Space Explorers has raised the issue recently, arguing that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] consideration is that of the inevitable collisions that will occur between our planet and other big rocks in space. A group called The Association of Space Explorers has raised the issue recently, arguing that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-56738</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-56738</guid>
		<description>&quot;The world&#039;s largest digital camera is to be used to &lt;a href=&quot;http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/25/1642203&amp;from=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;keep an eye out for asteroids heading towards Earth&lt;/a&gt;. The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) has been built by researchers at MIT&#039;s Lincoln Lab. At its heart is a 1.4 billion pixel (or 1400 megapixel) camera that will scan the night sky looking for rogue near-Earth objects from atop Mount Haleakala in Maui Island, Hawaii. The system uses something called an orthogonal transfer CCD to remove atmospheric blur from images.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The world&#8217;s largest digital camera is to be used to <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/25/1642203&amp;from=rss" rel="nofollow">keep an eye out for asteroids heading towards Earth</a>. The Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) has been built by researchers at MIT&#8217;s Lincoln Lab. At its heart is a 1.4 billion pixel (or 1400 megapixel) camera that will scan the night sky looking for rogue near-Earth objects from atop Mount Haleakala in Maui Island, Hawaii. The system uses something called an orthogonal transfer CCD to remove atmospheric blur from images.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-44676</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-44676</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080627.wsatellite27/BNStory/Science/home&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Canadian gadget that may save the world&lt;/a&gt;
In two years, a suitcase-sized telescope will boldly soar into space on a mission to detect crashing asteroids before it&#039;s too late

DAWN WALTON

From Friday&#039;s Globe and Mail

June 27, 2008 at 4:38 AM EDT

PRIDDIS, ALTA. — The space telescope will be no bigger than a hefty suitcase and weigh just 65 kilograms, but the Canadian scientists behind the project say when the device is launched two years from now, it may well go on to save the world.

The $12-million Near Earth Object Surveillance Satellite, dubbed NEOSSat, is considered a world&#039;s first - designed specifically as an early warning system to pinpoint asteroids on a collision course with Earth. It will also detect space junk in the path of other orbiting satellites to prevent crashes that could shut down telecommunications - television, telephone, GPS and banking systems - around the globe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080627.wsatellite27/BNStory/Science/home" rel="nofollow">A Canadian gadget that may save the world</a><br />
In two years, a suitcase-sized telescope will boldly soar into space on a mission to detect crashing asteroids before it&#8217;s too late</p>
<p>DAWN WALTON</p>
<p>From Friday&#8217;s Globe and Mail</p>
<p>June 27, 2008 at 4:38 AM EDT</p>
<p>PRIDDIS, ALTA. — The space telescope will be no bigger than a hefty suitcase and weigh just 65 kilograms, but the Canadian scientists behind the project say when the device is launched two years from now, it may well go on to save the world.</p>
<p>The $12-million Near Earth Object Surveillance Satellite, dubbed NEOSSat, is considered a world&#8217;s first &#8211; designed specifically as an early warning system to pinpoint asteroids on a collision course with Earth. It will also detect space junk in the path of other orbiting satellites to prevent crashes that could shut down telecommunications &#8211; television, telephone, GPS and banking systems &#8211; around the globe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sariade</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-35109</link>
		<dc:creator>Sariade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-35109</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s more to this than just an impact event.  The works of Clube and Napier bring out the issues of massive imputs of comet dust and debris.  These can cause as much or more problems than a massive impact.  You might find this article which references their work quite interesting:

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/129699-The-Hope</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s more to this than just an impact event.  The works of Clube and Napier bring out the issues of massive imputs of comet dust and debris.  These can cause as much or more problems than a massive impact.  You might find this article which references their work quite interesting:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sott.net/articles/show/129699-The-Hope" rel="nofollow">http://www.sott.net/articles/show/129699-The-Hope</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seed vault opening</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-34739</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seed vault opening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-34739</guid>
		<description>[...] or so other seed banks would be universally unable to survive something like a nuclear war or a comet or asteroid impact, $9.1 million is probably a sensible expenditure when so many potentially vital species are to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or so other seed banks would be universally unable to survive something like a nuclear war or a comet or asteroid impact, $9.1 million is probably a sensible expenditure when so many potentially vital species are to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-30776</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-30776</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sandia.gov/news/resources/releases/2007/asteroid.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sandia supercomputers offer new explanation of Tunguska disaster&lt;/a&gt;

Smaller asteroids may pose greater danger than previously believed

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — The stunning amount of forest devastation at Tunguska a century ago in Siberia may have been caused by an asteroid only a fraction as large as previously published estimates, Sandia National Laboratories supercomputer simulations suggest.

“The asteroid that caused the extensive damage was much smaller than we had thought,” says Sandia principal investigator Mark Boslough of the impact that occurred June 30, 1908. “That such a small object can do this kind of destruction suggests that smaller asteroids are something to consider. Their smaller size indicates such collisions are not as improbable as we had believed.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sandia.gov/news/resources/releases/2007/asteroid.html" rel="nofollow">Sandia supercomputers offer new explanation of Tunguska disaster</a></p>
<p>Smaller asteroids may pose greater danger than previously believed</p>
<p>ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — The stunning amount of forest devastation at Tunguska a century ago in Siberia may have been caused by an asteroid only a fraction as large as previously published estimates, Sandia National Laboratories supercomputer simulations suggest.</p>
<p>“The asteroid that caused the extensive damage was much smaller than we had thought,” says Sandia principal investigator Mark Boslough of the impact that occurred June 30, 1908. “That such a small object can do this kind of destruction suggests that smaller asteroids are something to consider. Their smaller size indicates such collisions are not as improbable as we had believed.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-30661</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-30661</guid>
		<description>&quot;All civilizations become either spacefaring or extinct.&quot;

Carl Sagan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All civilizations become either spacefaring or extinct.&#8221;</p>
<p>Carl Sagan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The foolishness of the International Space Station</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-26654</link>
		<dc:creator>a sibilant intake of breath &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The foolishness of the International Space Station</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-26654</guid>
		<description>[...] the James Webb telescope. I also support the idea that NASA should have some decent plans for dealing with an anticipated asteroid or comet impact. The ISS, by contrast, is a combination between technical fascination lacking strategic purpose and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the James Webb telescope. I also support the idea that NASA should have some decent plans for dealing with an anticipated asteroid or comet impact. The ISS, by contrast, is a combination between technical fascination lacking strategic purpose and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-25524</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-25524</guid>
		<description>&quot;Like climate monitoring, guarding the planet from asteroids always seems to fall between the cracks. Neither NASA nor the European Space Agency (ESA) has a mandate to stave off human extinction. The closest they come is NASA’s Spaceguard Survey, a $4-million-a-year telescope observing program to scan near-Earth space for kilometer-size bodies, the range that can cause global as opposed to merely regional destruction. But no one has done a systematic search for region destroyers, an estimated 20,000 of which come within striking range of our planet. No Office of Big Space Rocks is standing by to evaluate threats and pick up the red phone if need be. It would take 15 years or longer to mount a defense against an incoming body, assuming that the technology were ready to go, which it isn’t.

“Right now the U.S. doesn’t h</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Like climate monitoring, guarding the planet from asteroids always seems to fall between the cracks. Neither NASA nor the European Space Agency (ESA) has a mandate to stave off human extinction. The closest they come is NASA’s Spaceguard Survey, a $4-million-a-year telescope observing program to scan near-Earth space for kilometer-size bodies, the range that can cause global as opposed to merely regional destruction. But no one has done a systematic search for region destroyers, an estimated 20,000 of which come within striking range of our planet. No Office of Big Space Rocks is standing by to evaluate threats and pick up the red phone if need be. It would take 15 years or longer to mount a defense against an incoming body, assuming that the technology were ready to go, which it isn’t.</p>
<p>“Right now the U.S. doesn’t h</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-24829</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/09/14/big-rocks-in-space/#comment-24829</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawn_%28spacecraft%29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Dawn Mission&lt;/a&gt;, launched on September 27, 2007, is NASA&#039;s mission to send a robotic space probe to the two most massive members of the asteroid belt: the asteroid Vesta and the dwarf planet Ceres. Dawn is scheduled to explore Vesta between 2012 and 2013, and Ceres in 2015.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawn_%28spacecraft%29" rel="nofollow">The Dawn Mission</a>, launched on September 27, 2007, is NASA&#8217;s mission to send a robotic space probe to the two most massive members of the asteroid belt: the asteroid Vesta and the dwarf planet Ceres. Dawn is scheduled to explore Vesta between 2012 and 2013, and Ceres in 2015.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

