<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polymers in the Pacific</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/</link>
	<description>Temporarily Torontonian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:04:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-87037</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-87037</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8534052.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Plastic rubbish blights Atlantic Ocean&lt;/a&gt;
By Victoria Gill
Science reporter, BBC News, Portland 

Scientists have discovered an area of the North Atlantic Ocean where plastic debris accumulates.

The region is said to compare with the well-documented &quot;great Pacific garbage patch&quot;.

Karen Lavender Law of the Sea Education Association told the BBC that the issue of plastics had been &quot;largely ignored&quot; in the Atlantic.

She announced the findings of a two-decade-long study at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in Portland, US.

The work is the conclusion of the longest and most extensive record of plastic marine debris in any ocean basin.

Scientists and students from the SEA collected plastic and marine debris in fine mesh nets that were towed behind a research vessel.

The nets dragged along were half-in and half-out of the water, picking up debris and small marine organisms from the sea surface.

The researchers carried out 6,100 tows in areas of the Caribbean and the North Atlantic - off the coast of the US. More than half of these expeditions revealed floating pieces of plastic on the water surface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8534052.stm" rel="nofollow">Plastic rubbish blights Atlantic Ocean</a><br />
By Victoria Gill<br />
Science reporter, BBC News, Portland </p>
<p>Scientists have discovered an area of the North Atlantic Ocean where plastic debris accumulates.</p>
<p>The region is said to compare with the well-documented &#8220;great Pacific garbage patch&#8221;.</p>
<p>Karen Lavender Law of the Sea Education Association told the BBC that the issue of plastics had been &#8220;largely ignored&#8221; in the Atlantic.</p>
<p>She announced the findings of a two-decade-long study at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in Portland, US.</p>
<p>The work is the conclusion of the longest and most extensive record of plastic marine debris in any ocean basin.</p>
<p>Scientists and students from the SEA collected plastic and marine debris in fine mesh nets that were towed behind a research vessel.</p>
<p>The nets dragged along were half-in and half-out of the water, picking up debris and small marine organisms from the sea surface.</p>
<p>The researchers carried out 6,100 tows in areas of the Caribbean and the North Atlantic &#8211; off the coast of the US. More than half of these expeditions revealed floating pieces of plastic on the water surface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-81070</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-81070</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/08/29/1624215/Pacific-Ocean-Garbage-Patch-Worries-Researchers?from=rss&quot; title=&quot;Slashdot Science Story &#124; Pacific Ocean Garbage Patch Worries Researchers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pacific Ocean Garbage Patch Worries Researchers&lt;/a&gt;

NeverVotedBush writes with an update to a story we discussed early this month about an enormous accumulation of garbage and plastic debris in the Pacific Ocean, a thousand miles off the coast of California. The team of scientists has now returned from their expedition to examine the area and say they &quot;found much more debris than they expected.&quot; The team will start running tests on the samples they retrieved, and they are preparing to visit another section of ocean they suspect will be full of trash. &quot;The Scripps team hopes the samples they gathered during the trip nail down answers to questions of the trash&#039;s environmental impact. Does eating plastic poison plankton? Is the ecosystem in trouble when new sea creatures hitchhike on the side of a water bottle? Plastics have entangled birds and turned up in the bellies of fish, and one paper cited by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration estimates 100,000 marine mammals die trash-related deaths each year. The scientists hope their data gives clues as to the density and extent of marine debris, especially since the Great Pacific Garbage Patch may have company in the Southern Hemisphere, where scientists say the gyre is four times bigger. &#039;We&#039;re afraid at what we&#039;re going to find in the South Gyre, but we&#039;ve got to go there,&#039; said Tony Haymet, director of the Scripps Institution.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/08/29/1624215/Pacific-Ocean-Garbage-Patch-Worries-Researchers?from=rss" title="Slashdot Science Story | Pacific Ocean Garbage Patch Worries Researchers" rel="nofollow">Pacific Ocean Garbage Patch Worries Researchers</a></p>
<p>NeverVotedBush writes with an update to a story we discussed early this month about an enormous accumulation of garbage and plastic debris in the Pacific Ocean, a thousand miles off the coast of California. The team of scientists has now returned from their expedition to examine the area and say they &#8220;found much more debris than they expected.&#8221; The team will start running tests on the samples they retrieved, and they are preparing to visit another section of ocean they suspect will be full of trash. &#8220;The Scripps team hopes the samples they gathered during the trip nail down answers to questions of the trash&#8217;s environmental impact. Does eating plastic poison plankton? Is the ecosystem in trouble when new sea creatures hitchhike on the side of a water bottle? Plastics have entangled birds and turned up in the bellies of fish, and one paper cited by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration estimates 100,000 marine mammals die trash-related deaths each year. The scientists hope their data gives clues as to the density and extent of marine debris, especially since the Great Pacific Garbage Patch may have company in the Southern Hemisphere, where scientists say the gyre is four times bigger. &#8216;We&#8217;re afraid at what we&#8217;re going to find in the South Gyre, but we&#8217;ve got to go there,&#8217; said Tony Haymet, director of the Scripps Institution.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preserving plastic history</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-79649</link>
		<dc:creator>Preserving plastic history</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-79649</guid>
		<description>[...] Over at Slate, there is an interesting article about art and chemistry: specifically, about the challenges involved in preserving artwork and historical objects that were made from fundamentally unstable plastics. As the article points out, this is an odd reversal of what most of the world is trying to do, namely eliminate plastic wastes that are proving far more durable than would be ideal. For instance, there is the worrisome North Pacific Gyre: a huge garbage patch in the deep ocean. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over at Slate, there is an interesting article about art and chemistry: specifically, about the challenges involved in preserving artwork and historical objects that were made from fundamentally unstable plastics. As the article points out, this is an odd reversal of what most of the world is trying to do, namely eliminate plastic wastes that are proving far more durable than would be ideal. For instance, there is the worrisome North Pacific Gyre: a huge garbage patch in the deep ocean. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-79648</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-79648</guid>
		<description>Curators also need to watch out for biological agents.&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2221963/pagenum/2&quot; title=&quot;A generation of plastic art objects are degrading like overused Tupperware. Can they be saved? - By Sam Kean - Slate Magazine&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Molds and bacteria have evolved to eat plastics, and although it&#039;s not their preferred food&lt;/a&gt;, some beetles will eat through Plexiglas if hungry enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curators also need to watch out for biological agents.<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2221963/pagenum/2" title="A generation of plastic art objects are degrading like overused Tupperware. Can they be saved? - By Sam Kean - Slate Magazine" rel="nofollow"> Molds and bacteria have evolved to eat plastics, and although it&#8217;s not their preferred food</a>, some beetles will eat through Plexiglas if hungry enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-43840</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-43840</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2193693/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Scrubbing Out Sea Life&lt;/a&gt;
Exfoliating plastic beads feel good—unless you live in the ocean.
By Hillary Rosner
Posted Monday, June 16, 2008, at 2:45 PM ET</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2193693/" rel="nofollow">Scrubbing Out Sea Life</a><br />
Exfoliating plastic beads feel good—unless you live in the ocean.<br />
By Hillary Rosner<br />
Posted Monday, June 16, 2008, at 2:45 PM ET</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-43442</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-43442</guid>
		<description>Respirometry tests work perfectly for newspapers and banana peels. (Newspapers take two to five months to biodegrade in a compost heap; banana peels take several days.) But when scientists test generic plastic bags, nothing happens—there&#039;s no CO2 production and no decomposition. Why? The most common type of plastic shopping bag—the kind you get at supermarkets—is made of polyethylene, a man-made polymer that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2193256/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;microorganisms don&#039;t recognize as food&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respirometry tests work perfectly for newspapers and banana peels. (Newspapers take two to five months to biodegrade in a compost heap; banana peels take several days.) But when scientists test generic plastic bags, nothing happens—there&#8217;s no CO2 production and no decomposition. Why? The most common type of plastic shopping bag—the kind you get at supermarkets—is made of polyethylene, a man-made polymer that <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2193256/" rel="nofollow">microorganisms don&#8217;t recognize as food</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-29187</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-29187</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://thetyee.ca/News/2007/11/21/PacificGarbagePatch/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Earth&#039;s Eighth Continent&lt;/a&gt;

It swirls. It grows. It&#039;s a massive, floating &#039;garbage patch.&#039;
Published: November 21, 2007</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thetyee.ca/News/2007/11/21/PacificGarbagePatch/" rel="nofollow">Earth&#8217;s Eighth Continent</a></p>
<p>It swirls. It grows. It&#8217;s a massive, floating &#8216;garbage patch.&#8217;<br />
Published: November 21, 2007</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-26194</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-26194</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2007/10/22/floating-toxic-plast.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Floating toxic plastic garbage island twice the size of Texas&lt;/a&gt;

By Mark Frauenfelder

kosmik ray says: &quot;A little-known island continent of floating toxic plastic garbage, TWICE the size of Texas, is growing in the pacific between Califormnia and Hawaii. Officially known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, until it can be taxed, U.S. officials will continue to ignore it. I heard of it once many years ago, but it apparently has been growing tenfold each decade since the 1950&#039;s, and now consists of 80% plastic. It has also been called Gilligan&#039;s Island, from the trashy TV sitcom that won&#039;t go away.&quot;

    The enormous stew of trash - which consists of 80 percent plastics and weighs some 3.5 million tons, say oceanographers - floats where few people ever travel, in a no-man&#039;s land between San Francisco and Hawaii.

    ...

    The patch has been growing, along with ocean debris worldwide, tenfold every decade since the 1950s, said Chris Parry, public education program manager with the California Coastal Commission in San Francisco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/10/22/floating-toxic-plast.html" rel="nofollow">Floating toxic plastic garbage island twice the size of Texas</a></p>
<p>By Mark Frauenfelder</p>
<p>kosmik ray says: &#8220;A little-known island continent of floating toxic plastic garbage, TWICE the size of Texas, is growing in the pacific between Califormnia and Hawaii. Officially known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, until it can be taxed, U.S. officials will continue to ignore it. I heard of it once many years ago, but it apparently has been growing tenfold each decade since the 1950&#8242;s, and now consists of 80% plastic. It has also been called Gilligan&#8217;s Island, from the trashy TV sitcom that won&#8217;t go away.&#8221;</p>
<p>    The enormous stew of trash &#8211; which consists of 80 percent plastics and weighs some 3.5 million tons, say oceanographers &#8211; floats where few people ever travel, in a no-man&#8217;s land between San Francisco and Hawaii.</p>
<p>    &#8230;</p>
<p>    The patch has been growing, along with ocean debris worldwide, tenfold every decade since the 1950s, said Chris Parry, public education program manager with the California Coastal Commission in San Francisco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-26040</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-26040</guid>
		<description>Hilary,

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrified_wood&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Petrified wood&lt;/a&gt; is actually a type of fossil. The original materials in the wood have been replaced by minerals. In the right circumstances, this can happen to wood today. It is possible that before microbial digestion of wood, this would have occurred more frequently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilary,</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrified_wood" rel="nofollow">Petrified wood</a> is actually a type of fossil. The original materials in the wood have been replaced by minerals. In the right circumstances, this can happen to wood today. It is possible that before microbial digestion of wood, this would have occurred more frequently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-25914</link>
		<dc:creator>hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-25914</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t that why there is petrified wood? the microorganisms couldn&#039;t digest it. Otherwise it would just have rotten away wouldn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t that why there is petrified wood? the microorganisms couldn&#8217;t digest it. Otherwise it would just have rotten away wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-25402</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-25402</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Apparently, when plants first evolved lignin and cellulose, bacteria were unable to digest them. Until that changed, wood would have been as enduring as...plastic wrap&lt;/em&gt;

That is really hard to imagine. Were the first forests like the mounds of diapers in landfills today - choking all the life under them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Apparently, when plants first evolved lignin and cellulose, bacteria were unable to digest them. Until that changed, wood would have been as enduring as&#8230;plastic wrap</em></p>
<p>That is really hard to imagine. Were the first forests like the mounds of diapers in landfills today &#8211; choking all the life under them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Laing</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-25393</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Laing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/09/polymers-in-the-pacific/#comment-25393</guid>
		<description>I spoke with Caitlin about the history of thinking the future will be awful. She says people have always believed the future was going to be terrible, but they didn&#039;t believe it would be terrible because the humans would ruin it until the Victorian gothic period - in other words, until the Industrial revolution. Strange how correct that seems, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke with Caitlin about the history of thinking the future will be awful. She says people have always believed the future was going to be terrible, but they didn&#8217;t believe it would be terrible because the humans would ruin it until the Victorian gothic period &#8211; in other words, until the Industrial revolution. Strange how correct that seems, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

