<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Studies backing successive IPCC reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/23/studies-backing-successive-ipcc-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/23/studies-backing-successive-ipcc-reports/</link>
	<description>dispatches from Canada's capital</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anon @ Wadh</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/23/studies-backing-successive-ipcc-reports/#comment-26289</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon @ Wadh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/2007/10/23/studies-backing-successive-ipcc-reports/#comment-26289</guid>
		<description>Interesting figures. How many different researchers were involved in the TAR and 4AR, respectively?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting figures. How many different researchers were involved in the TAR and 4AR, respectively?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 4.615 seconds -->
