<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David MacKay&#8217;s sustainable energy calculations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/</link>
	<description>Temporarily Torontonian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sustainable Energy &#8211; Without the Hot Air</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-79669</link>
		<dc:creator>Sustainable Energy &#8211; Without the Hot Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-79669</guid>
		<description>[...] David MacKay&#8217;s sustainable energy calculations [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David MacKay&#8217;s sustainable energy calculations [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting Green Done</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-79512</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting Green Done</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-79512</guid>
		<description>[...] offers some valuable on-the-ground observations that are lacking in higher level discussions like that of David Mackay. While the detail is welcome, the book does sometimes lack a sense of the bigger picture. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] offers some valuable on-the-ground observations that are lacking in higher level discussions like that of David Mackay. While the detail is welcome, the book does sometimes lack a sense of the bigger picture. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-78714</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-78714</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/withouthotair/c28/page_215.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A plan that adds up, for Scotland, England, and Wales&lt;/a&gt;. The grey-green squares are wind farms. Each is 100 km2 in size and is shown to scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/withouthotair/c28/page_215.shtml" rel="nofollow">A plan that adds up, for Scotland, England, and Wales</a>. The grey-green squares are wind farms. Each is 100 km2 in size and is shown to scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-77832</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-77832</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2009/04/09/sustainable-energy-w.html&quot; title=&quot;Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air: the Freakonomics of conservation, climate and energy - Boing Boing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air: the Freakonomics of conservation, climate and energy&lt;/a&gt;

By Cory Doctorow on Science

David JC MacKay&#039;s &quot;Sustainable Energy -- Without the Hot Air&quot; may be the best technical book about the environment that I&#039;ve ever read. In fact, if I have any complaint about this book, it&#039;s in how it&#039;s presented, with its austere cover and spartan title, I assumed it would be a somewhat dry look at energy, climate, conservation and so on.

It&#039;s not. This is to energy and climate what Freakonomics is to economics: an accessible, meaty, by-the-numbers look at the physics and practicalities of energy. MacKay, a Cambridge Physics prof, approaches the subject of carbon and sustainability with a scientific, numeric eye. First, in a section called &quot;Numbers, not adjectives,&quot; he looks at all the energy and carbon inputs and outputs in Britain and the rest of the world: this is how many kWh of energy are needed to power all of Britain&#039;s vehicles. This is how many kWh you would get if you covered the entire British shore with windmills, or wave-farms. This is Britain&#039;s geothermal potential. Here&#039;s how much carbon vegetarianism offsets. Here&#039;s how much carbon unplugging your idle appliances saves (0.25%, making the campaign to switch off energy vampires into a largely pointless exercise -- as MacKay says, &quot;If everyone does a little bit, we&#039;ll get a little bit done&quot;). This is the carbon-footprint of all of Britain&#039;s imports, gadgets, office towers, and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/04/09/sustainable-energy-w.html" title="Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air: the Freakonomics of conservation, climate and energy - Boing Boing" rel="nofollow">Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air: the Freakonomics of conservation, climate and energy</a></p>
<p>By Cory Doctorow on Science</p>
<p>David JC MacKay&#8217;s &#8220;Sustainable Energy &#8212; Without the Hot Air&#8221; may be the best technical book about the environment that I&#8217;ve ever read. In fact, if I have any complaint about this book, it&#8217;s in how it&#8217;s presented, with its austere cover and spartan title, I assumed it would be a somewhat dry look at energy, climate, conservation and so on.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not. This is to energy and climate what Freakonomics is to economics: an accessible, meaty, by-the-numbers look at the physics and practicalities of energy. MacKay, a Cambridge Physics prof, approaches the subject of carbon and sustainability with a scientific, numeric eye. First, in a section called &#8220;Numbers, not adjectives,&#8221; he looks at all the energy and carbon inputs and outputs in Britain and the rest of the world: this is how many kWh of energy are needed to power all of Britain&#8217;s vehicles. This is how many kWh you would get if you covered the entire British shore with windmills, or wave-farms. This is Britain&#8217;s geothermal potential. Here&#8217;s how much carbon vegetarianism offsets. Here&#8217;s how much carbon unplugging your idle appliances saves (0.25%, making the campaign to switch off energy vampires into a largely pointless exercise &#8212; as MacKay says, &#8220;If everyone does a little bit, we&#8217;ll get a little bit done&#8221;). This is the carbon-footprint of all of Britain&#8217;s imports, gadgets, office towers, and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-77122</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-77122</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to note that this site is now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.withouthotair.com/reviews.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mentioned on the website for MacKay&#039;s book&lt;/a&gt;, in the &#039;reviews&#039; section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to note that this site is now <a href="http://www.withouthotair.com/reviews.html" rel="nofollow">mentioned on the website for MacKay&#8217;s book</a>, in the &#8216;reviews&#8217; section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-76927</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-76927</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/27/increasing-renewable-capacity-is-much-harder-than-increasing-energy-consumption/#comment-76926&quot; title=&quot;Increasing renewable capacity is much harder than increasing energy consumption&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More detail on MacKay&#039;s approach&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/27/increasing-renewable-capacity-is-much-harder-than-increasing-energy-consumption/#comment-76926" title="Increasing renewable capacity is much harder than increasing energy consumption" rel="nofollow">More detail on MacKay&#8217;s approach</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-76787</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-76787</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Collapse&lt;/em&gt; is what I am reading for June, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Collapse</em> is what I am reading for June, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-76784</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-76784</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve already downloaded it, but I am still pushing through Collapse for June.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already downloaded it, but I am still pushing through Collapse for June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-76777</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-76777</guid>
		<description>It really does speak to many of our discussions.

For instance, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/withouthotair/cC/page_269.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this chapter&lt;/a&gt; provides a detailed explanation of why making planes slower doesn&#039;t make them more energy efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really does speak to many of our discussions.</p>
<p>For instance, <a href="http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/withouthotair/cC/page_269.shtml" rel="nofollow">this chapter</a> provides a detailed explanation of why making planes slower doesn&#8217;t make them more energy efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/05/25/david-mackays-sustainable-energy-calculations/#comment-76772</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=5570#comment-76772</guid>
		<description>I would be willing to read it for July&#039;s book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be willing to read it for July&#8217;s book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

