<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the Cambridge ivory tower to Whitehall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2009/11/08/from-the-cambridge-ivory-tower-to-whitehall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/11/08/from-the-cambridge-ivory-tower-to-whitehall/</link>
	<description>Temporarily Torontonian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/11/08/from-the-cambridge-ivory-tower-to-whitehall/#comment-83622</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=6659#comment-83622</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8349715.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Go-ahead for 10 nuclear stations&lt;/a&gt;

The government has approved 10 sites in England and Wales for new nuclear power stations, most of them in locations where there are already plants.

It has rejected only one proposed site - in Dungeness, Kent - as being unsuitable on environmental grounds.

A new planning commission will make decisions on the proposals &quot;within a year&quot; of receiving them, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband told MPs.

Nuclear was a &quot;proven and reliable&quot; energy source, he said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8349715.stm" rel="nofollow">Go-ahead for 10 nuclear stations</a></p>
<p>The government has approved 10 sites in England and Wales for new nuclear power stations, most of them in locations where there are already plants.</p>
<p>It has rejected only one proposed site &#8211; in Dungeness, Kent &#8211; as being unsuitable on environmental grounds.</p>
<p>A new planning commission will make decisions on the proposals &#8220;within a year&#8221; of receiving them, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband told MPs.</p>
<p>Nuclear was a &#8220;proven and reliable&#8221; energy source, he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/11/08/from-the-cambridge-ivory-tower-to-whitehall/#comment-83619</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=6659#comment-83619</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see how late and over-budget they end up being.

(If you want me to fix the above link and spelling, just let me know where the former was meant to point.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how late and over-budget they end up being.</p>
<p>(If you want me to fix the above link and spelling, just let me know where the former was meant to point.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/11/08/from-the-cambridge-ivory-tower-to-whitehall/#comment-83618</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=6659#comment-83618</guid>
		<description>Britian &lt;A&gt;just approved&lt;/a&gt; new nuclear build:
 &lt;blockquote&gt; 
The government has announced 10 new sites for nuclear plants – and a new regime to speed up the approval of planning decisions.

Most are at the site of existing power stations, so maybe there won&#039;t be much local opposition anyway. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britian <a>just approved</a> new nuclear build:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The government has announced 10 new sites for nuclear plants – and a new regime to speed up the approval of planning decisions.</p>
<p>Most are at the site of existing power stations, so maybe there won&#8217;t be much local opposition anyway.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/11/08/from-the-cambridge-ivory-tower-to-whitehall/#comment-83612</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=6659#comment-83612</guid>
		<description>Look &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/29/business/energy-environment/29nuke.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;how much trouble Finland is having&lt;/a&gt; with their Olkiluoto nuclear plant.

Is it really plausible for the UK to quadruple their reactor fleet size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/29/business/energy-environment/29nuke.html" rel="nofollow">how much trouble Finland is having</a> with their Olkiluoto nuclear plant.</p>
<p>Is it really plausible for the UK to quadruple their reactor fleet size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/11/08/from-the-cambridge-ivory-tower-to-whitehall/#comment-83596</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=6659#comment-83596</guid>
		<description>Speaking last week on his first day as chief scientist at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, MacKay set out a vision of how Britain could generate the threefold increase in electricity it needs, with nuclear power at its heart.

He cited Sizewell B, Britain’s largest nuclear power station, as a benchmark.

“This plan would involve a fourfold increase in nuclear power over today’s levels,” he said. “So at Sizewell, for example, you would have four Sizewell Bs and at other nuclear sites you would have another four Sizewell Bs, and so on.”

He added: “Britain could never live on its own renewables. If the aim is to get off fossil fuels, we need nuclear power or solar power generated in other countries’ deserts, or both.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking last week on his first day as chief scientist at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, MacKay set out a vision of how Britain could generate the threefold increase in electricity it needs, with nuclear power at its heart.</p>
<p>He cited Sizewell B, Britain’s largest nuclear power station, as a benchmark.</p>
<p>“This plan would involve a fourfold increase in nuclear power over today’s levels,” he said. “So at Sizewell, for example, you would have four Sizewell Bs and at other nuclear sites you would have another four Sizewell Bs, and so on.”</p>
<p>He added: “Britain could never live on its own renewables. If the aim is to get off fossil fuels, we need nuclear power or solar power generated in other countries’ deserts, or both.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/11/08/from-the-cambridge-ivory-tower-to-whitehall/#comment-83595</link>
		<dc:creator>.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=6659#comment-83595</guid>
		<description>&quot;Professor David Mackay: Britain &#039;must go nuclear&#039; to control climate.&quot; By Jonathan Leake: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6860181.ece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Professor David Mackay: Britain &#8216;must go nuclear&#8217; to control climate.&#8221; By Jonathan Leake: <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6860181.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6 860181.ece</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

