<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gas by gas, or all together?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sindark.com/2009/12/17/gas-by-gas-or-all-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/12/17/gas-by-gas-or-all-together/</link>
	<description>Temporarily Torontonian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:04:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.sindark.com/2009/12/17/gas-by-gas-or-all-together/#comment-84893</link>
		<dc:creator>R.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sindark.com/?p=6775#comment-84893</guid>
		<description>Uber-GHGs like CFCs, HFCS, PFCs, etc should perhaps be dealt with though a mechanism other than carbon markets. The idea came up in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sindark.com/2009/12/03/black-carbon-and-climate-change/#comment-84451&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the thread on black carbon&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uber-GHGs like CFCs, HFCS, PFCs, etc should perhaps be dealt with though a mechanism other than carbon markets. The idea came up in <a href="http://www.sindark.com/2009/12/03/black-carbon-and-climate-change/#comment-84451" rel="nofollow">the thread on black carbon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

