Foregoing WEP and WPA

Bruce Schneier, the security guru and internet sensation, has been suggesting that people unlock their wireless networks. Given the constant and well-justified anxiety that exists about computer security, it is unconventional advice. That said, he argues effectively that the risks are fairly limited and that it is a neighbourly thing to do. Who hasn’t benefitted once or twice from the availability of an open wireless network? They were invaluable during my early weeks in Ottawa: allowing me to access Craiglist, Google Maps, and other vital apartment-hunting data while I was out there searching.

I am going to try leaving my wireless network open for a couple of weeks. If it doesn’t seem likely to burst my 200GB monthly bandwidth cap, I will leave it that way indefinitely. Hopefully, it will transpire that others have done the same when I start hunting around for a quieter flat in a more interesting neighbourhood this spring.

15 Responses to “Foregoing WEP and WPA”

  1. Milan Says:

    See also:

    Let my packets go!
    Secrets and Lies

  2. Milan Says:

    Schneier on Security: Stealing WiFi Access

    Schneier on Security: Schneier Asks to Be Hacked

    Schneier on Security: Wi-Fi Liabilities

    Schneier on Security: Wi-Fi Eavesdropping

    Schneier on Security: Securing Wireless Networks with Stickers

    Schneier on Security: Security Risks of Airplane WiFi

    Schneier on Security: WiFi Tracking

    Schneier on Security: WiFi Driver Attack

    Schneier on Security: Stealing Free Wireless

  3. Milan Says:

    Why it’s good to leave your WiFi open

    By Cory Doctorow on If you don’t like something change it

    Bruce Schneier has a wonderful essay up on Wired explaining why he runs an open wireless network at home — and how that fits in with security. I’ve run open wireless networks since the late 1990s (in five cities in three countries) and I’ve never encountered the problems that everyone says are inevitable — network contention, crap from my ISP, busts for the child-porn my neighbors are downloading from my network.

    Instead, I’ve provided network access to innumerable people — people like me: I can’t count the number of times I’ve had my ass saved by an open wireless network at the right moment (e.g., in good time to help me look up directions, a phone number, or flight details). I figure the more open wireless I provide to the world, the more people I’ll turn on to providing their own open wireless access, and the more open WiFi I’m likely to find.

  4. Padraic Says:

    I called in to CBC Radio’s Spark to defend *using* unlocked wifi and got criticized by all the other callers…although I was only operating under the assumption that no one would do so intentionally.

  5. Milan Says:

    Padraic,

    I can understand the skepticism of others. I am heeding Schneier’s advice and running it open for a while. Naturally, I am tracking what happens across my network.

    We will see how sensible it proves in retrospect.

  6. Litty Says:

    Very generous. Where in Ottawa do you live, again?

  7. Tristan Laing Says:

    What’s wrong with organizations like Free Toronto WiFi, where you are asked to leave your internet open, but people can access it only at the cost of revealing some personal information in an account. Their usage can be traced, presumably for the purposes of preventing abuse.

  8. Milan Says:

    Tristan,

    It doesn’t sound like anything is wrong with that. People really worried about abuse could set up monitoring systems on their home networks.

    It is easy enough to use a Mac program like Eavesdrop to watch the traffic on your wireless network. Anything not encrypted comes up as clear as day.

  9. . Says:

    Security Expert Leaves His Own Wi-Fi Network Wide Open

    By Glenn Fleishman

    I don’t advise opening your home network because securing your desktop computers and even laptops is so much of a hassle most of the time, that simply disabling local network access—over which more attacks can be launched because many firewalls consider the local network a trusted network and lower their defenses—is the lowest-hanging fruit for average users’ protection.

  10. . Says:

    Whose bandwidth is being given away?

  11. . Says:

    Why it’s good to leave your WiFi open
    Posted by Cory Doctorow, January 10, 2008 10:18 AM | permalink

    Instead, I’ve provided network access to innumerable people — people like me: I can’t count the number of times I’ve had my ass saved by an open wireless network at the right moment (e.g., in good time to help me look up directions, a phone number, or flight details). I figure the more open wireless I provide to the world, the more people I’ll turn on to providing their own open wireless access, and the more open WiFi I’m likely to find.

  12. . Says:

    Bruce Schneier Has An Open Wi-Fi Network
    from the share-and-share-alike dept

    If you’re a complete networking neophyte (not that many of those probably read Techdirt), you should probably get some advice from someone more technically savvy about good Internet security practices. Actually, you should do that whether or not you choose to open your wireless network. But on the list of potential network security threats, an open wi-fi network is probably pretty low on the list.

  13. . Says:

    Open wireless. Oh my.

    I don’t have a DHCP server running, so anyone who wants to use my wireless needs to configure a static address on the correct subnet. I’m happy to do this for guests who don’t know how, but drive-bys are strictly on the do-it-yourself system.

  14. a sibilant intake of breath » Blog Archive » Re-encrypting WiFi Says:

    [...] I had to shut down my open wireless network experiment. That is because I found three people within the span of two days who were both (a) criminal and [...]

  15. . Says:

    There are few forces more powerful
    than geeks desperately trying to get
    internet in a new apartment.

Leave a Reply