Daily updates – Page 124 – a sibilant intake of breath

Exploring Oxford colleges

At the same time as the second chapter of my thesis is firming up, my initiative to visit and photograph all 39 colleges is proceeding apace. Today, I visited Somerville College (where Margaret Thatcher read chemistry, a factor that may have contributed to her eventual strong support for CFC regulation, despite her ideological leanings) as well as Kellogg, St. Peter’s, and Lincoln. Only Linacre, Mansfield, Oriel, Pembroke, St Cross, St Hilda’s, and Templeton College have been spared from my lenses as of now. That said, not all the photos I have taken in recent days have had the chance to be posted yet. When one is mired in academic work, it is good to have a reserve. Likewise, it is good to have a pattern of exploration, using a quad or coffee shop here or there to read a chapter or two, before moving on to the next target.

A tip for fellow explorers: make sure you speak to the porters, before wandering in. Particularly in the less well known colleges, they will be happy to let you in if you tell them that you are a student at a different college and have been wanting to have a look at some of those you haven’t seen previously. Among all the colleges I have visited so far, the porters at Kellogg and Lincoln have been the most helpful. The only colleges that have refused me admission (or demanded money) are Christ Church and Magdalen. While I understand that they risk being besieged by tourists, it is hardly appropriate to bar the foreign graduate students who are subsidizing their fine stonework and scores of undergraduates.

In any case, I expect that the collection will be complete by the time this site gets its 50,000th visit. That should be within the next two weeks, at which time I will be spending my days fretting about drafting chapter three.

On darkness

A student housing vignette

When one of your circuit breakers blows, you need to go ask your landlords for the key to the cupboard where the switches are. When the light bulb in one room burns out, you use candles until the college replaces it.

The first, you can really do very little about. The second reflects the transitivity of the whole experience.

Favourite reading spots in Oxford

One of the most telling things about a person’s personality may be which places they choose to do the masses of reading meant to dominate the lives of an Oxford student. There is a certain sort that appreciates the reading rooms in the Bodleian (and another sort forced there due to the location of necessary materials). Some people like the cold modernism of the Social Sciences Library, while others adore the grandeur of the Upper Camera.

Personally, I tend to stick to a collection of locations around the centre of town. These include the Wadham Library (more for a sense of connection to the college than because it is attractive or has useful materials), the Wadham MCR, the Codrington Library, the Upper Camera, and the Starbucks locations on the High Street and Cornmarket Street. Sometimes, if it is nice, the Wadham gardens get added to the rotation, especially the little area at the western edge of the private fellows’ garden that is a bit obscured by plants. That said, I probably read more in my room than in all other places put together – enormously more if you include things read on the computer.

What places do other residents appreciate? Are there any that I simply must try during the 125 days that remain to me here?

The Oxford Botanic Gardens

As places in Oxford go, the Botanic Gardens across from Magdalen College are a real jewel. They are peaceful, beautiful, intellectually engaging, and easily capable of yielding dozens of good photos, even if you have been there many times before.

During Oxford’s long winter, the greenhouses make for a particularly nice contrast both with the world outside and with each other. Some are arid and no warmer than the air outside (largely filled with interesting cacti); others are almost tropical in warmth and humidity and contain many plants normally seen only as foodstuffs – from coffee to black pepper, tea and ginger. Some of the flowers are also quite dramatic.

The gardens are free for students and university staff all year round, and simply open to everyone during the winter.

PS. The connector on my snazzy Ety headphones seems to be broken. Jostling it around even a little bit causes the sound to cut out on one side or the other. I will call them on Monday about having them repaired.

Reading fiction aloud

I attended a sustainability forum in Wadham tonight, followed by a fancy dinner. I even got to see a well situated and previously unexplored room in college. Much more enjoyable, however, was spending a couple of hours later in the night reading aloud from Stanislaw Lem’s Mortal Engines, Simon Singh’s Fermat’s Last Theorum, Vladamir Nabokov’s Lolita, Jack Kerouac’s On the Road, and chapters 2-47 of Mark Haddon’s The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time.

I really love fiction, and quite enjoy reading aloud. With unfamiliar text, it can be quite challenging, even in the best of circumstances. You need to develop an intuition for the shape of an author’s phrases, so that you can start speaking the first portion without reading the end. Perhaps, that explains why I appreciate Nabokov so much and never enjoyed Faulkner. I don’t think you could read the latter aloud, except in halting steps where an entire sentence was decoded before the first syllable was uttered.

Somewhat harried

Largely because of the thesis, I have fallen behind in what are normally two everyday activities: reading fiction and keeping up with my correspondence. The latter is the more embarrassing lapse, as messages of various kinds accumulate. Still, if I am to have a chapter written by Wednesday, I need to keep cracking. This one will lay out the early history of both climate change and POP research, so it involves quite a few finicky details that need to be related to the major themes and questions of the work. It also requires a broader appreciation of the roles played by different individuals and organizations. This has been fairly easy to untangle for the Stockholm Convention, despite its relative obscurity, but the sheer scale of the discussions about climate change makes it quite hard to gain a rigorous sense of who was acting most effectively and why. I am still searching for a really good history of the UNFCCC, IPCC, and Kyoto processes.

PS. Many thanks to Meaghan and Lindi for the postcards. I will reply soon, possibly with postcards from Wales.

Go

Anyone who has even been curious about the game of Go should try this interactive tutorial. Wikibooks also has an introduction, though it does not seem to have been fully written yet. The game is an attractive looking and tricky one, as employed as a dramatic device in the film A Beautiful Mind. Notably, Go is also a game in which the best human players can consistently beat very powerful computers. Unlike chess, it would appear, sheer number crunching ability is not enough to succeed at Go.

Normally played on a grid of 19×19 intersecting lines, the objectives of Go are to capture enemy stones, while also surrounding terrain. Players take turns placing stones on the board, in any position except one where the stone would be immediately captured. Stones or groups of stones that are encircled, such that there are no clear paths or ‘liberties’ extending from them, are captured. Finally, a player may not make a move that would return to the board to how it was immediately before their opponent’s last move (the ‘ko’ rule). The rules according to which stones are placed are very simple, making it initially surprising that the complexity of the game can be so great. Eventually, the game ends when both players pass their turn, indicating that neither sees a possibility for further gains.

As a beginner, playing on a 13×13 board is recommended. The standard size board has more than twice as many intersections to contest, and is probably too much for someone without a developed sense of the game to manage. Learning how to play decently is one project that I will need to suspend, until more pressing tasks are complete.

Nicholas Stern on climate change

During the initial coverage of Nicholas Stern’s report on the economics of climate change, I wondered why the media was paying so much attention. After all, the man is an economist reporting on something that scores of scientists have addressed comprehensively through the IPCC process. Now that I have heard him lecture, and spoken briefly with him personally, I have a much better sense. The man is what Karen Litfin calls a ‘knowledge broker,’ translating scientific data into policy options.

His basic position is the realistic liberal optimist one:

Climate change is real and potentially devastating
It is essentially a massive economic externality
Regulating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is the way to stop it
This can be done at moderate cost (1% of GDP) and without a massive change in (a) the basis of economic activity within the developed world or (b) the way in which people choose to live their lives.

He acknowledges that the energy balance needs to shift dramatically. In order to be responsible, he says, we need to shift all electrical production in the rich world to carbon neutral forms (renewables, nuclear, and possibly hydrocarbons with sequestration) by 2050. By that time, land transport should also be based on power sources that do not emit GHGs, whether because they are using stored electricity, or because they use fuels that are GHG neutral. India and China need to be encouraged to sequester the CO2 emitted from their coal stations, probably at the expense of the rich world. All in all, rich states should bear 60-80% of the costs of mitigation.

He focused a great deal on atmospheric CO2 levels. His target is to stabilize between 450ppm and 550ppm. This would lead to a likely scenario where mean global temperature rises by about 2 degrees Celcius (though by much more at the poles, given the nature of the climatic system). On the basis of a ‘business as usual projection’ we will hit 450ppm in eight to ten years. To stabilize at 450ppm, we would need to slow the rate of growth in GHG emissions immediately, having it peak in 2010. Then, we would need to reduce at about 6-10% a year thereafter. If we delayed the peak to 2020, we would likely be at the 550ppm portion of the range: an area that the German head of climate change policy expressed grave concern about, during the question session. Stern himself said that 550ppm is the “absolute upper bound” which it would be “outrageous” to exceed.

As for his very controversial decision about discounting rates, I think he defended himself admirably. He broke it into two bits: the possibility there will be no future generations beyond date X (they ascribed a 0.1% chance a year to an event like a comet or gamma ray burst that would simply snuff humanity out) and the strong likelihood that people in the future will be richer. The latter means that it may be economically efficient to delay some of the costs of dealing with climate change, especially given the probability that new technology will emerge.

I need to move on to other work, though I could discuss his comments for many thousands of words. I will transfer my handwritten notes to the wiki later this evening and link them here: notes from Nicholas Stern’s 21 February 2007 address to Oxford University.

PS. A few weeks ago, my default thesis music was Jason Mraz‘s superb album “Live at Java Joe.” Now, I am listening to Enter The Haggis‘ frantic song “Lannigan’s Ball” from their album Aerials over and over again.

Michaelmas 2006 supervision report

Today, I received Dr. Hurrell’s assessment of my performance in the first term of this year:

He is taking the IR of the Developing World paper this term and tells me that he is enjoying it and that it is going well. He also gave a presentation to the MPhil thesis seminar. He is making good progress with the MPhil thesis: the core question is getting narrowed down and he certainly has a range of incisive and very interesting ideas. He should have the two overview chapters of his two case studies by early in the New Year. The task in the new phase is to relate the general issues in the argument as far as possible to specific details of the cases – rather than back to more general issues. I would also note that he has continued to face quite severe financial problems resulting from the fact that he has received less in the way of student loans than he had expected.

A good assessment, all told. The last bit is probably meant to signal that he had said helpful things to the university and college bursary committees when they approached him. They will be making a decision with regards to whether they will help cover my student loan shortfall next week.

My first substantive chapter is to be finished by next Wednesday. There is really very little slack in the system now. The second substantive chapter will be due by the 15th of March, with the third due at the end of March. That will be the last opportunity to discuss anything with Dr. Hurrell. Then, I run off to Dorset for a week of frantic editing (possibly with no internet access – gasp!). Then, I will have the remainder of April prior to the 22nd to finish editing, have the thing printed and bound, and collapse in a heap, quite possibly driven to madness by the stress of the whole thing.

My tutorial reports for last year were blogged previously: Michaelmas, Hilary, and Trinity. Having put all this stuff online in the most searchable and comprehensible way possible, I hope it will help at least one person to (a) decide whether to pursue the M.Phil in International Relations here or not and/or (b) help people in the program later navigate through it.

Scribble, scribble and fancy dinners

This is going to be a busy week. I have one project due on Thursday, a thesis chapter due next Wednesday, and a great many smaller things to get through besides. Rumour has it that I have some kind of international law seminar ongoing, as well. This week, we are discussing: “International Law-Making: Treaties, Custom and Beyond.” This is also going to be my second week at Oxford that involves a trio of formal dinners: the Strategic Studies Group dinner in New College tonight, my Senior Scholarship high table dinner in Wadham on Wednesday, and the Wadham College Stahl dinner on Friday. The last of those apparently commemorates a rich benefactor of the college and involves fellows and a handful of students. Hopefully, I will see some of the people who I have met once or twice over the course of the year, but very rarely see week-to-week.

With the entire thesis due – printed, bound, and dropped off – in nine weeks’ time, I don’t see subsequent weeks being any less busy. At least there is the four-day exception of the Snowdonia trip to look forward to, not to mention the monastic thesis completion retreat to Dorset at the beginning of April.

Back to reading and scribbling…

[Update: 21 February 2007] Since no fellows are dining tonight or tomorrow, it seems this will be the first week this year where I don’t get a dinner in Wadham as a Senior Scholar. It will be a shame to break my thirteen week run of them, but I suppose the Stahl dinner on Friday is a good substitute.

PS. I have decided on a topic for my Richard Casement internship application. I just need to edit it, as well as come up with proper Economist opening and closing sections. Ideally, you want to open the article with something interesting, esoteric, but seemingly unrelated and then close it with a further clarification that reveals the analogy in a witty way.