Breast-obsessed journalism

One definite issue with The Economist is that they can be somewhat sexist at times. Writing one obituary to a pair of breasts might be excusable. Writing a second is excessive, especially if you go on to mention them in a third weeks later.

Back in 2004, they even commented on their tastes:

The Economist, apparently, had more frontal nudity in its photographs than all the other magazines combined. When it came to “partial breast exposure”, it was at the top of the league. Particularly curious to the authors was our use of sexual content to illustrate stories on topics such as finance and technology. A photograph of three bikini-clad beauty contestants, used to illustrate a story on financial regulation, with the caption “Pick your regulator”, was both emblematic and problematic.

It’s probably time to give it a rest.

Author: Milan

In the spring of 2005, I graduated from the University of British Columbia with a degree in International Relations and a general focus in the area of environmental politics. In the fall of 2005, I began reading for an M.Phil in IR at Wadham College, Oxford. Outside school, I am very interested in photography, writing, and the outdoors. I am writing this blog to keep in touch with friends and family around the world, provide a more personal view of graduate student life in Oxford, and pass on some lessons I've learned here.

2 thoughts on “Breast-obsessed journalism”

  1. More cheek from the Economist. Sexist attitudes dressed up in snappy and lucid writing still suck.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *